Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
sis
well i i i
it's very rare
that we see agreement between
to prominent
new york times op ed dot
writers
one being paul krugman to the other being david brooks
and uh... worthy of note and particularly as we head into this uh...
big emigre eg immigration a battle
uh... because
this is uh... uh... another one of those issues
that will
uh...
will wrap up our the republican party in many respects and we're already seeing
uh... guys like markle wrote me a lot there
trying to trying in some way
to put down a marker for his twenty sixteen ron
uh... in the meantime we may actually get
some type of
some type of immigration reform
uh...
that uh...
is beginning to look at some what encouraging
i mentioned uh... yesterday uh... the proposal from the gang of eight
which i guess turned out to be seven
uh... because was it was that uh... that uh... dropped off some report republican
senator who
thought there was too much and missed the
about this uh... proposal
uh... but we will talk about that as we continue so
uh... paul krugman yesterday excuse me i'm mohammed sunday
all rights makers takers and fake urs
any rights the prom in a republicans have begun acknowledging that their
party needs to improve its image
but here's the thing their proposals for makeover all involve changing the sales
pitch rather than the product
when it comes to substance the g_o_p_ is more committed to add then amber
the policies that take
from most americans
and give to a wealth of wealthy handful
the republican party has a two-prong strategy right now
to regain some type of the national foothold
one is to pretend that they're not crazy
the other is to jerry raid
elections in what have been leaning blues states on a national level
by
coming up with these uh... new type of electronic all
schemes
we've talked about these electoral schemes
but getting back to the uh... makeover
the extreme taken over there trying to do
uh... david brooks echoes
paul krugman
on the surface republicans are already doing a good job beginning to change
their party
but so far there have been more calls for change than actual evidence of
change
in this uh... reinvention process republicans seem to have spent no time
talking to people who didn't already vote for them
they'd both site jim dahl and paul ryan
and uh... ruby o
but as paul paul krugman reminds us that
back in louisiana jim dahl is pushing a plan to eliminate the state's income tax
you know we've got a couple emails and i've got received a couple of tweets
from our listeners saying
there is a move by republicans in states like kansas like in the louisiana
uh... probably uh... a little bit less than a half dozen others
to get rid of the income tax and replace it
with a state uh... who excuse me to get rid of the state income tax and replace
it
with sales taxes
however as crewmen points out
income tax falls most heavily on the affluent
and sales taxes fall much more heavily on the poor in middle class
the result would be big gains for the top one percent substantial list losses
for the bottom sixty percent
krugman goes on to talk about this in a more economic terms of course
brooks is not so concerned about that
bulb os happy in his suburbs
but brooks' pieces completely
incomprehensible
he goes on to say he is opposing government as your primary objective
it's hard to have a positive governing program on this i agree with
i've been saying it for six to eight years i think on the radio
that the republicans cannot lead government because they they are
fundamentally opposed to existence
they don't see it
as a mechanism
to enhance people's lives
brooks goes on to say after budget gibberish the next problem with this
mentality is that it makes it hard for republicans to analyze social and
economic problems
that don't flow directly from big government
brooks uh... apparently feels that he has the attack at capacity to do this
although
uh... when you just talked about anecdotes
that center around who drink chablis
uh... more one might find it hard
moreover given all the anti government rhetoric
people never trust these republicans the reformed church programs like social era
de medicare
can't be for entitlement reform and today's g_o_p_ because politically the
two will never go together
well uh...
because
can curl polygons change their underlying mentality to adopt these
realities
intellectual history says no
it's probably few child to try and change the car republicans
so what is uh...
david brooks is
fascinating prescription for this problem
it's smart to build a new window of the republican party
the second g_o_p_ wouldn't be based on the encryption story
that being that government is encroaching on your individual liberty
it would be based on the idea that america has been hit simultaneously by
two crisis
which you might call the main core olson crisis in the charles murray crisis
also argued that nation's decline because there is any institutions get
loaded in
school ***
and retired national dynasty dynamism
murray argues that america is coming apart dividing into two nations
one with high education level stable families and good opportunities
that the other low education levels on stable families a bad opportunities
well aside from uh... realistic relating the charles murray's
horrible individual many respect
uh... it sounds like what uh... brooks is uh... signing off on his
john edwards two americas
the second g_o_p_ would tackle both problems at once
it would be filled with people who recoils that president obama second
inaugural address
because of it success of faith in centralized power
but who don't share the absolute antigovernment story of the current
g_o_p_
well what it sounds like is he wants to go back to the first uh...
the first inaugural address of president obama
and the way that president obama has basically been
uh... leading but let's leave that aside for a moment
the question
the central question david brooks
leaves us with at the end of his pieces
who's going to build a second g_o_p_
and fortunately for david brooks i have the answer no-one
no one
the entire project of
the republican base
for the past ten years it is true grit itself
of that second g_o_p_
the david brooks
so desperately pines for
in fact to the extent that you need a second g_o_p_ you're looking at probably
uh... third to a half of the democratic party
that embraces is neoliberal policies
basically let saying let's have a kinder gentler way of screwing over the middle
class
and the poor in this country
by dave david brock's actually comes out david metz dennis you know what happens
to david brooks
he loses his job
he's got no reason to exist
he doesn't get invited back on to uh... on two nd
the layering order whatever whatever whatever that can be a shipment
is that the lira port
you no longer can use our the newshour
so david brooks pretends like there is some possibility
talk about intellectual history
david brooks pretends there's some possibility for second g_o_p_ it is what
it is
mister brooks
uh... i don't know how what's left for him to write
yuki to spend the rest of the decade reading vehicle bliss for all the things
that he wrote the first part kustra crap crap at at as possible
you setup the the vision of iraq wrote for the first week is a radio show and
he was talking with the guy who oppose the invasion he said
how does it feel that your entire world you crumble
he said that the seventy-seven somebody pulls the invasion there you go well now
he knows
although i suspect that happen quite a while ago he still needs the cash check
stuff