Fox N' Friends Proposes Iq Test for Politicians Proposing Gun Control

welcome back to the david back-bencher baby you any amazon dot com shopping you could be supporting the david packard show without it costing you even one penny more disco tour website david patten dot com on the right side of the website you'll see a banner that takes you to amazon bookmark that link do your shopping checkout you won't see anything different but amazon will send david pack and show seven percent of your purchase and it's actually uh... thousands of items are being purchased every month through that link elicits a big deal it is it's it's great for the show unit you can also of course the committee that happens remember made possible in part by liberal bias dot com in a free society everyone could vote on what theories to believe but sometimes elite liberal scientists will rely on so-called facts and it just shows they have a liberal bias find out more uh... liberal bias dot com today's new member of the day is jean shud now gene shot now thank you thank you for being edited patent remember jean and thanks to everybody else it's the number one funding source for this program i i i don't know if i never mentioned that before i think you have min box in france proposed and i_q_ test wait for it for politicians sponsoring gun control legislation now we've talked on this show a lot of times about theoretically i_q_ test to vote i_q_ test to run for office i had a chance to have children exactly and we've got a had these broader discussions about what is it what is the effect on society of proposing such policies and what would it kind of say about what our rights and what our privileges and all that type of thing oh on fox and friends the fact that they're having this conversation is funny on a lot of levels number one is that their hand picking one woman want democratic politician in uh... like think it's in colorado diana to get realize didn't know that gun magazines are not bullets in other words the magazine is not the bullets itself and boxing fans and well-being is you have a nike it's est if you did you go and control legislation which of course is absurd because why would you single that out but what what we see what what about the need for talking about legislation where people's lives are in the balance what about if you get into anything related to health care or abstinence only education or abortion maybe should have to pass the i_q_ test that ironing for favor of her comprehensive allergens of testing here for all elected officials let's take a look at the video from fox and friends meantime this is only going to be an interesting topic to discuss the absolutely nothing to politicians be subjected to an i'd seen test in order to be able to serve this interesting that are in congress in the new york post today because it sends from diana two cats and to get she was a u_s_ that represent about a colorado memory last week recovered something she said with regard to convent role and her knowledge of magazines and ammunition many people were upset and quite startled when she said and just very briefly to your last question but advocacy of pad banning these magazine claps i will tell you these it maintenance is meson ammunition their ballots so the people who have those now they're going to shoot them and so if you're banned if you've ended in the future that number of these high-capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically overtime they can't the bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available of fidel before we hear the part from the fox news hopes this is this is this is just becuase no she's talking that's where that's completely fine the problem is she thinks that bullets are magazines and she's wrong there's a bunch of republicans that think giving guns the teachers is gonna be good there obviously also ron and maybe we should be i_q_ testing them right so it's very disingenuous to to pick this but looks now follow the conversation on fox and friends it's extraordinary she actually says she doesn't shan sponsoring factor all done legislation and that she doesn't even know what a magazine issue thinks a magazine is what type of and so in this hour in this column are written for their questions today by gwen harlan reynolds he talks a little bit about how if somebody's going to be in and capitol hill or in congress the response or a decision for you to vote on something you'd better know what you're talking about right i for example if you're running provides the president you should know that africa isn't a country it's a continent or i don't know maybe you should be able to name a single newspaper that you read just basic stuff was on a second they want calling for i_q_ test there uh... i wonder if there's any connection the syrup human she's a republican mhm yeah i don't know the army clearly here we have someone who we're just never told the difference between ammunition and magazines which by the way wouldn't even show up on a nike test memory for dynamic time italian restaurant at a time you'd ever tell me that's that uh... this that this is a bottle opener right uh... and i've never seen any bottle opener like it and i don't know what they use for having something kind of bottles how do you expect me to know exactly what it is by i'm calling the double standard or here i think that if this were on msnbc and chris matthews a rachel maddow said the same comment about requiring an i_q_ test per some dumb republican who said we need to put more guns in schools or whatever the things that we disagree with we would have no problem with that common started incorrect here is the statement if anybody called for i key tests to be to hold elected office from a certain level in up are with say let's explore that however i think the rock and a lot of the truck the issue that we could discuss that the problem here is that they're saying if you're gonna propose it legislation which seeks to reduce gun ownership or control who can have guns only if you're on that's i don't have one issue i think that if racial matos said that if you would clearly be called a joke knoll with tickets to ususally in the same way that these guys are really being serious about this wouldn't be the most absurd part about this there's many people who don't even want background checks for everybody buying a gun and now all of a sudden we're skipping all the way too high q_ test that seems a little weird to me i wish there were i_q_ tests