Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
>>> WELCOME BACK TO "THE LEAD."
AND CONTINUING WITH OUR WORLD
LEAD.
IT'S ONE THING TO HAVE PICTURES
FROM SPACE OF POTENTIAL OBJECTS,
QUITE ANOTHER TO SPOT THEM WITH
A NAKED EYE AND MUCH CLOSER UP.
SO FAR, SEARCHERS HAVE NOT FOUND
A SINGLE SCRAP FROM THE PLANE.
CONDITIONS ARE SO ROUGH, PLANES
COULD BE RIGHT ON TOP OF THE
DEBRIS AND MISS IT.
>> Reporter: THE SEARCH FOR
FLIGHT 370 IS CONCENTRATED ABOUT
1500 MILES OFF AUSTRALIA'S WEST
COAST.
FIVE COUNTRIES PHOTOGRAPHED
FLOATING OBJECTS THAT COULD BE
LINKED TO THE MISSING PLANE.
AUSTRALIAN SATELLITES DETECTED
TWO.
THEN THE CHINESE SPOTTED THIS.
THE FRENCH PHOTOGRAPHED 122
OBJECTS.
THAILAND SATELLITE SPOTTED 300
AND WEDNESDAY THE JAPANESE
DETECTED 10.
BUT SEARCH CREWS EYEBALLING THE
INDIAN OCEAN HAVE NOT FOUND A
SIGN OF FLIGHT 370 OR ANY
FLOATING OBJECTS BELIEVED TO
MATCH THOSE CAPTURED ON
SATELLITE.
>> IT'S NOT PERFECT.
IT'S A COMBINATION OF THE HUMAN
EYE AND SERVICE CONDITIONS.
>> Reporter: BOTTOM LINE, WAVES
AS HIGH AS TWO-STORY BUILDINGS
IS THE BEST OPTION BUT NOT A
PERFECT ONE.
>> ASSUME 100% COVERAGE, MEANS
YOU'RE VISIBLY LOOKING AT EVERY
SQUARE INCH OF THE SEARCH AREA.
THE BEST WE NORMALLY GET ON A
LONG-TERM AVERAGE IS ABOUT 78%
PROBABILITY OF DETECTION.
>> Reporter: AND THAT'S IN CALM
WATER.
WALDOCH PREDICTS THIS MAKES IT
ONLY ABOUT 50%.
BIG WAVES ALSO MAKE IT HARD FOR
PLANES AND SHIPS TO DETECT
OBJECTS ON THEIR RADAR.
>> THE WRECKAGE THAT WE'RE
LOOKING FOR IS SO CLOSE TO THE
WATER LINE THAT OUR RADAR WOULD
NOT BE ABLE TO PICK IT UP.
SO WE ARE VERY RELIANT ON
LOOKOUTS, BINOCULARS.
>> Reporter: WITH WEATHER
GROUNDING SEARCHERS, TWICE AS
MANY SHIPS ARE NEEDED.
>> YOU'VE STILL GOT TO GO OUT
AND LOOK.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU START
BELIEVING IN, IF YOU DO THIS
ENOUGH, IS LUCK.
>> Reporter: HE SAYS THE BEST