Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
The latest live-action adaptation of Superman released on the 75th anniversary of that comic,
managed to gross three times its $250-million budget. Zack Snyder directs the 143 minute
epic, which by all accounts is a sloppy convoluted and complicated mess that still manages to
entertain every step of the way. Henry Cavill stars as the title character as we see his
origin story on Krypton has a baby and blasted off to small-town Kansas where he becomes
the most powerful humanoid on the planet. While I’m not a fan of all American superheroes
being played by English actors, Cavill does a great job in the title role, perfectly balancing
that seriousness and sly likability. Amy Adams, Michael Shannon, Diane Lane, Russell Crowe,
Kevin Costner, Christopher Maloney, Richard Schiff, and Laurence Fishbone, round out the
gigantic supporting cast. Most of which turn in fine performances except for Amy Adams
who felt out of place in most scenes and appears later is a convenient love interest just because
the plot requires it. The action-packed cold open gives us explosive glimpses at Krypton,
Superman's home world, as it’s ravaged by disastrous earthquakes from within. And it's
in these scenes that we get to see Shannon’s intense determination to save the planet and
later, his motivation on becoming the villain, in a role he absolutely nails. The pg-13 rated
film keeps itself emotionally grounded as it balances between flashbacks of a young
Clark Kent dealing with childhood struggles, and Cavill, dealing with superhero powers
in modern day society. While Costner warns his adopted space baby: “People are afraid
of what they don't understand”; Crow is meanwhile encouraging his son to use his force
for good and represent an ideal. If this interplay between the two father figures that gives
audiences a better understanding of the Superman character than ever before. So when the evil
Michael Shannon arrives on Earth to capture Supermen dead or alive, or destroy Earth in
the process, you appreciate the stakes that much more. While I have nothing against Hans
Zimmer’s score, John Williams’s is iconic theme is sorely missing from this picture.
When the ignorant US military foolishly captures the title character, he coyly says in a powerful
interrogation scene: “Let's put our cards on the table” to clearly indicate that he
is cooperating, not by force but because he's just polite. And apparently that’s why we
all love the Man of Steel—he’s the ideal embodiment of heroism. But is it necessary
that every single fistfight he gets into has to destroy a building in the process? The
biggest issue I had with this movie is the fact that during the climax Superman and Zod
destroy every building and structure in Metropolis. It is neglectful actions likely result in
the death of hundreds of thousands of people. It is something that is never addressed in
the film and not anything audiences can ignore. Although he could have eased up a bit on the
annoying product placement, director Zack Snyder does a good job of intensifying these
ridiculous fights with quick camera moves and loud sound effects. The slowly paced action
film crescendos into a loud and visual ***. The special effects here are incredible but
the action sequences are so far removed from reality, they are devoid of tension or dramatic
elements. They become nothing more than meaningless cartoon fights—you have two super mortals
battling each other between a rock and a hard place, neither of them can defeat each other
so what is the point? And when the flying spandex-wearing aliens aren’t killing each
other, the movie is far too serious for its own good. It could definitely use the Marvel
treatment and just wrote a few jokes here and there. I definitely enjoyed any sequence
where the military was trying to cooperate with Superman. The dialogue there was really
interesting and fun to watch unfold. But a secondary plot running parallel to climax
involving Daily Planet workers trying to outrun falling buildings, did absolutely nothing
for me. I don't know who they were or why should care about them. I'd be totally fine
watching them get crushed by concrete. Assembled like a delicate house of cards, this movie
collapses under intense scrutiny. Dozens of plot holes and contrived conveniences ruin
this movie if you actually look close enough. But if you just lay back and let the empty
Hollywood fluff wash over you, this is a supremely entertaining and totally enjoyable movie for
all fans a superhero films and action movies. A commendable and interesting reboot but this
is easily the grittiest and most somber picture in the franchise. I won’t have issue watching
it again but there was a lot of untapped potential here and I hope they go in a lighter direction
for follow-up installments. Man of Steel: excessively violent, but emotionally compelling.
Those are my thoughts on this blockbuster now let’s see what you had to say in the
YouTube comments.
Let's take a look at Man of Steel the rate-o-matic: a double SEVEN. Somewhat controversial opinions
on this one with people rating it everything from a ten to a two. You thought the movie
was all over the place, but still had a good time. Your scores averaged to a COOL. And
I completely agree. There were parts of this movie I liked and parts I hated. At the end
of the day though, I left the theater with a smile on my face and that's all you can
really ask for. I thought it was COOL as well.