Mitt Romney Wants to Overturn Roe V Wade, Surrogate Says Romney Won't

welcome back to the david fashion show becuase amazon any online shopping use the blackberry david happened dot com just click it before you do your shopping and then you actually send seven percent your purchase to the data package so it's a great freeway to support the show you can also support us by becoming a david packard show member made possible in part by liberal bias dot com as you know luis as we discussed earlier liberal bias is everywhere you can find in polls statistics factory to liberally biased make sure you educated about all sorts of liberal bias by checking out liberal bias dot com you can also support the show by running around telling everybody that didn't happen or about your incredible production skills i think most people are you know about the event that they can't speak for themselves today's needed back and show member of the day douglas rack up douglas racket was great to have douglas i don't know if that was caused by god griffin caused by the full uh... douglas naima i wouldn't doggie wordy were a could be any number of things but i will go with his uh... his formal name douglas and it's great to have a board as well as every other day the package of member mit romney in the past has said that roe versus wade should actually be reversed he said my view is that the supreme court should reverse roe v_ wade and send back to the states the responsibility for deciding whether abortion should be legal or not she also called it on his campaign website a case of blatant judicial activism and he promised to appoint judges that will follow the law and the constitution when asked about roe v_ wade certainly seems to imply that he would like to see roe v_ wade overturned and that he would hire judges that he thinks might actually do that putting that aside for a second bring reality aside for a second norm coleman is former senator norm coleman showed up talked to a bunch of jews who they're trying to convince the vote for uh... for mit romney that probably aren't going to the jewish vote is going over well mainly to president obama and said now there's no risk of overturning roe v_ wade this is what norm coleman had the same take a listen resolved right now the reality is is uh... sources as you failures there cavaliers yahya so with that for the staffing he's basically saying left george w_ bush must against abortion he was in eight years and roe v_ wade was an overturned so is what's actually worse here is he saying mit romney is lying about wanting to overturn roe v_ wade or if you think mit romney simply going to be ineffective at making the changes he believes in another what he would like to overturn it but come on he's not going to be able to do it inouye it's print that it seems like what's going on here is that roe v_ wade will not be overturned regardless of romney's point-of-view wanted i don't know it's not going to hear about the whole world look back up as i get it met running is able to a point one or two conservative supreme court justices rover with is absolutely on the table it sits on the table yeah doesn't mean you will be overturned i mean like he said even in the bush eric it it was not overturn masson and it's pretty clear that the only reason why dorm coleman statement is factually true is because bill clinton was president and selected a couple of liberal justices to balance the court five to four at the core were six to three you would have had that extra swing vote in anthony kennedy potentially and you probably would have seen roe v_ wade overturned scalia and thomas are waiting to overturn it netting toledo and and robert might as well so if you have romney uh... replaces bruce peter ginsburg with a conservative you'll probably see roe v_ wade overturned the ending with i have a sense that you have us at the same sense that i have of the sense either is half of their sense of mit romney supreme court justices well let me back up in other words i think people incorrectly ignoring the effect that the next president whether it's another four years for president obama or four years for mit romney would have on the supreme court and the effect that that could have on what we now consider to be just kind of part of american legal framework of the structure i don't i think you're not giving giving up consideration for that to the real changes that we could see that is that possible i think it is but at the same time i i think if i think there are plenty of justice is currently i'm not gonna make anyone of claims by making out on just gonna say a i think it's unlikely either way that'll be overturned is it more likely if it's mit romney more likely in stock so that both that both you and what is more incremental walk