Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
There are four sets of couples in this section of the mosaic.
This one's quite a clear one. It's not fragmented.
Could you tell me what's going on in this scene?
That's a really interesting question
because there's been some quite fierce debate
about what this couple represents.
What we can be relatively sure of is that she represents a water nymph
because she's got the reeds in her hair.
She's resting on an overturned urn of water.
He's a bit trickier to identify but we can look at his iconography
to give us some clues.
So he's got the shepherd's crook.
He's got a floppy red hat
which was typical of the east of the empire
and he's holding pipes so he might be a shepherd.
For this reason, people have thought that he might represent Paris,
the Trojan prince, but other people, more recently,
have proposed a different identification as Attis
who was also a mythological figure from the East.
This has got more support
because there's actually a painting from Pompeii
that shows a very similar scene
but it gives us a detail that's missing here.
That's a little knife in the hand of the male figure.
That's meant to refer to an episode in Attis' life
where he actually castrates himself in a religious frenzy.
So more people now are starting to think
that this represents Attis and a nymph rather than Paris and a nymph.
So even though this is not fragmentary,
it's perfectly clear,
we can't be sure about interpreting what this mosaic is about?
No, unfortunately not because this sort of couple,
wearing similar costumes and holding similar attributes,
actually appears in very diverse narrative contexts from antiquity.
People have taken this as evidence
that craftsmen might have used pattern books
and might have bought a pattern book to the villa
so that he could have chosen the myths to decorate his house.
So that would account for some of these standardisations
of myths across the empire.
So maybe the local craftsman that was working on this mosaic
wouldn't have actually known what the story was.
No. Possibly not, no.
That's actually very different from the way I work
because I actually am the artist and the maker.