Obama Signs NDAA, ACLU Disgusted

president baba uh... on new year's eve signed of the national defense authorization act gee i wonder why he did it and i was eating a lot of heat for it from progressives who we need to step up and win the election just figure that out and so he does it but when no one is paying attention uh... any deciding statement along with it though on h_r_ fifteen forty uh... so first of all a lot of people to say hey wait a minute now sucker them say that this bill uh... allows for the indefinite mission of u_s_ citizens gazette one portion of the bill this is this a shot mock change the laws regarding detention of uh... united states citizens except there's a another portion of the bill that says that it does change the law an outlet has purposely vague because we do change the law but they didn't want a keyboard so they put another provision in there uh... well you know hopefully you're confusing up bites so what does it do it leaves it to the exam branch as to whether they would like to take those extra powers or not what usually happens with the executive branch they take those powers president osvaldo wants to make clear that under his administration but there's a good french will not be ten u_s_ citizens says he's given the option in this bill basically with the date language as one portion definitely states that he can detain u_s_ citizens okay heat addresses signing statement uh... that objects to sections ten twenty one ten twenty two ten twenty three twenty four twenty five twenty six twenty seven twenty eight twenty-nine twelve thirty one twelve forty forty one forty two forty-five forty four in other words he objects to any nor miss portion of this bill but nonetheless he will sign it if you're a member we objected greatly deciding statements under george w bush that was of course and a different you're aware now apparently if your democrats will say side extremists are fantastic now why do we injected jump to wag graphic number of six year now this is in the signing statement from president bomber it gives you a and expose sense of why we object at the signing statements whether they're under republican or democratic administrations quote should any application of these provisions conflict with my constitutional authorities i would treat the provision as non-buying excuse me but what the hell is that did you guys headed for the week any of us think service courses the president by letting us with the civics course he taught constitutional law when the constitution doesn't say hey by the way a president to sign a bill but then say that by entry to any party doesn't like is non-binding let's talk a little guys until they ever art calling out within iraq war our government to say in a lot uh... the president is basically the generated in the united airlines aa like part adlai barbie well eighteen other parts and let you pass it in its entirety and i cited is in its entirety but that is not how i will execute the law it's rediculous it was ridiculous when bush did it that's why i was so mad about it is still ridiculous under obama on the forces of the signing statement that i like yes to the problem is one you can't have it signing statement be constitutional view ask me anything to ask a decent law professor and then at number two other administrations and other courts will not take this signing statement as law because he'd isn't law is the president's dipping in and out along all that he's actually putting into effect now let's go to the parts but i kind of like but show you the problem of those as well so he says it has set aside a statement i've signed this bill despite having serious reservations was certain provisions that regulated attention interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists now i'd like that he has reservations with it lot of people read that sender's contact that sixty i knew a bomb was on the right side but the fact that he has reservations is the relevant the fact that he signed it baseball irrelevant that you could have all the rest of your life decided they obey the law its law now second part sister clarified that my administration will not off to rise indefinite military detention without trial of american citizens india i believe the doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation again i like those statements i think a lot of people look at those things with a new open was on the right side cincy he won't be there and everything is in fact as against our core principles but the keywords in those sentences my administration i wanna clarify that my administration will not authorize indefinite military affairs the next uh... inefficient is perfectly free to do that because it is the law you signed into law you don't get the said hey you know what the vice-president on their president gingrich then he has had the same intervention of the small but i do in fact he doesn't even make that could be just as my administration would do it but it will be locked so you can be definitely detain later i don't know this part of his re-election campaign did then turn around at six so you don't want elect a republican because they might indefinitely detain u_s_ i signed into law but will out of the goodness of my heart shoes not to do it of lectures by much uh... any continues in the scientific my administration will interpret section ten twenty one of the belt in a matter that issue is that any tension at authorizes complies with the constitution the laws of the war and or other applicable law he said is there mahi administration will interpret section ten twenty one of the most offensive section in the bill but it's still in the bill and they could choose to have a different interpretation on a different day we're supposed to be a country laws not of men that were not supposed to depend on the never once of our leadership okay laws are lost and he just cited into laws saying yes further admit my administration future administrations indefinitely detained which by the way goes that point the people who said hey you know what poner dispelling says that no previous laws are the facts and make an invigorated in devon leading assists really then why is the president keep talking about it is signing state artistically thinks the bill does allow for that he saying the dole outs work but my administration will choose not to do it if that's good enough for you look if you are a role model for other reasons that's perfectly understandable no question about right i get that i might even agree with right but if you want to say that he didn't do the just atrocious active signing a word one of the worst piece of legislation interfax really now you're all the bill install eileen indefinite detention the president understanding knowledge is that and says he might not do it pleases me you know what was the worst photo let's take that he is a hundred percent truth teller although he has not been in the past in terms of campaign promises and this time he means it anyone coached saw a lot the next president at a republican or democrat you should never signed it now a lot of people have been making one last charge bose take you weren't going real all the people like him the that actually rebuilds and i can't believe they read about wages which distrust of goodwill president obama but it was rejected everyday probably say no as interesting 'cause the american civil liberties union has a whole team of lawyers they all looked at it and there's a conclusion angela romero instead of director of the a_c_l_u_ says president one of the actions today is a blight honors legacy thus you will for ever be known as the president to sign indefinite detention trough charge or trial into law so what's the next thing that they sell you get it all wrong all of their lawyers also don't know what they're doing you know this is their job american civil liberties okay she apparently not all they don't know if there are another people read that the other side of the lawyers understand it all the president but when it is but do you think he's as is possible alright one last one from the a_c_l_u_ we are incredibly disappointed the president obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court any hope of though bob initiation would roll back the constitutional excessive george bush in the war on terror was x anguish today is that clear enough for you he is not going to do what he said he was going to do when it comes to civil liberties he is not going to roll back the excesses of the bush administration and he's going to continue them and enforcing with this law khadafy them and strengthen