Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
We havenít actually talked about your special trainingÖ
No.
and why it is that you do have some parallels with Duncan OíFinioan.
So, having talked about the sort of Defense Authorization Act
at least in a very surface way and explained that this is your motivation
can we actually go down that road to where we talk about where youíve been?
Some of the information you have -- because youíreÖ
I donít know if itís your clearance level that gave you that additional information
about black projects and about certain aspects of wellÖ
to name Area 51 specifically, possibly other places that you havenít told me about yet
Do you want to start down that road slightly?
Sure.
The level of secrecy and secret facilities and
the capabilities of our nationally-kept secrets
would shatter most peoplesí imagination of what is possible.
Area 51, Los Alamos, Dulce...
a hundred other Top Secret bases
where information is kept or hidden from the public in general.
It would be very hard to accept that
all of this information that is currently held secret and classified is actually real.
And you know this, because, why?
Because Iíve experienced things in the military
that Iíve then told people about, and by and large, people that have never
held a Top Secret clearance would call me,
either at the mildest, a liar; the greatest accusation, crazy!
Certainly my experience at Area 51 in psy training
and what I learned there and the abilities that
evolved from those training sessions that we all seem to pick up on rather easily
were most easily described to the laymen as ëJedií skills.
Itís very easy - if you know what I know - to see the correlation between what
happens in the movie in the Jedi training and what happens in Area 51 and psy training.
Certainly we in the Nines all possessed
a certain level of intuition and ability that would seem
advanced to anyone who watched us use it.
Can you elaborate on what you may have come across,
because if youíre using these abilities -- youíre in Area 51,
what level did you go down to, or whatever?
Are you aware of off-world craft? I mean you know whatís out there inÖ
Iím not sure how much you know about Camelot, but I assume the general
amount of information on the Internet...
What can you substantiate having personal sort of knowledge of?
Extra ñ beyond human ñ abilities for every human;
not subject to popular belief, but we, as human beings,
are far more capable of using many, many advanced skills beyond five senses.
With a little bit of training
and the knowledge that it was actually possible, most people could
accurately predict the possibilities of the future;
to know when other people were thinking about them.
[To] pick up on what is easy to describe as reading people,
here you donít really need to use your five senses to
be able to know what somebody else is thinking or feeling.
A lot of that simply has to do with the belief thatÖ
and the understanding that itís possible.
That opens up a lot of doors.
Duncan OíFinioan talks about having been enhanced physically.
do you feel that you were enhanced physically?
No, when I hear Duncanís story,
the things that he experienced are very similar to what I experienced based on the fact that
you were never told that the actual belief
in what you were doing was giving you the ability.
You were given something, a caveat, a carrot, an enhancement.
They could jam a small piece of metal in your arm
and thatís enough to get you believing that you have these abilities and they turn on,
but one really doesnít have anything to do with the other per-seÖ
I have had a device implanted in me and I later
was of the understanding that that device did not do what I was told it was doing.
It was not to provide enhancement; it was to provide monitoring.
But youíre basically saying that itís the mental abilities that youÖ
itís like a placebo in the sense that as long as you believe itÖ
Öthe placebo effect, yesÖ
Öthat it gives you that ability to do super-human-type things?
Right, and thatís very important, because if you teach people these things,
you want to be able to turn those things off if you want to.
If you want to take those abilities away from people, if you donít want them to have them anymore
so if you tell them the true nature of the abilities
then you canít take the belief away anymore -- you have to
pull the piece of metal out of the arm that says you donít have the enhancement anymore...
- Well itís the Tin Man... and, you know. - Yes.
being told that he doesnít have a heart -- he needs to have a heart installed,
- when in fact, he had a heart all alongÖ - Exactly.
or maybe thatís the Lion? I forget who, but allÖ
- Lion was courage, but yeah. - several of the beings in that story!
So, okay, well, thatís very valuable,
so you basically were given that kind of thing and I would say thatÖ
ÖLet me interject.
The six months where I was undergoing all the psychological treatment,
I did go through a period of time where I believed
all of my abilities to be gone or taken away.
In í08 with some help,
I was able to transcend the barrier from using those talents,
and now Iíve been able to refine and enhance those abilities
far beyond the levels that I had in the military, which
comes in handy when cops chase your cell phone GPS!
Okay absolutely.
Alright, so... But to get back to Area 51,
and I understand that at this point you would be violating a Security Oath to talk about it right?
Let me put it in terms that itís
easier for me to say and not have to go into the details of how I know, but just that I know.
Iíll present it to everybody very simply.
What could be so important at Area 51 that would require the level of secrecy that
is in existence around that facility?
Well certainly, if I said that we kept the US Space Fleet there
and that the Space Fleet was what we would understand to be UFOs, even though
the technology is easy to describe and easy to talk about and easy to educate people on.
You need a lot of background in the evolution of the science that makes those things possible
to be able to accept that the US has
dozens, if not hundreds, of vehicles that are
more than capable of space flight. And...
Maked so...
We would have a fleet of vehicles that would be seemingly extraterrestrial
and the reason that this has to be kept that way is because, if you know those vehicles exist,
you start to question the technology that they are based on.
And when you start to do that, then you start to question
why weíre still using petroleum products, solid-fuel rocket boosters and
everything else and things get quickly out of hand after that.
So to keep those vehicles a secret is to keep everything else a secret,
which is why you would need
that level of security to prevent anybody from finding out about it.
Okay, but that Space Fleet, as you call it, is capable of going...?
- to where? - Anywhere easily throughout the Solar System
without much time or hindrance to the occupants.
Okay, and explain how fast one could get to Mars, for example?
Just below the speed of light.
Okay butÖ in an hour?
A day, I would say would be more reasonableÖ incredibly fast.
Okay, but have you seen these vehicles yourself?
- Iíve seen one type of one vehicle -- - Okay.
and compared to
when I saw it, which was more than ten years ago,
and what should exist now -- I would say that it was a
tinker toy bucket of parts compared to what we should have in existence now,
based on the evolution of the technology that I know.
As far as off-world bases, I do not possess any personal knowledge.
I do, however, believe in and have seen information that would suggest that
anybody with a decent telescope could take a look
at both the surface of the moon and the surface of Mars
and see some things that look very terrestrialÖ
- Sure. - Öand things that didnít exist...
twenty or thirty years ago.
One of the caveats that I do have some personal information
that I did get personally involved in
was some information that had to do with the Stargates and Looking Glass
and more specifically, the 2012 problem with those projects.
the... oh I guess, popular opinion of
whatís out there right now is that the project was shut down
because there was a problem? When we approached 2012...
Iíve heard it described a number of ways, but to my knowledge, the problem is
is that the timelines converge on that point in time.
And when you...
know enough about the Stargate Projects and the Looking Glass Project to know that...
how String Theory works and how the possibility of possibilities works,
and how making one choice over here doesnít necessarily mean that
the other choice couldnít exist at the same time...
But once you get your brain wrapped around this subject,
you find out that at the end of 2012,
in an easy way to put it,
the choices that we make become less and less consequential to the future.
Eventually, weíre pushed into this bottleneck of time,
no matter which choice we make.
And thatís important to the people that had access to Looking Glass because
they would use Looking Glass knowing
the choices that they would make and the future would pop up.
The big mistake was coming up with the possibility of future.
And when we started using the computer to say: Well,
if we make this choice, itís 79% possible that this scenario happens,
and 23% possible, or whatever, you know, round numbers, that this scenario would happen.
The understanding at the time was that was realistic.
However, if you go down the road further and
free will continues to exercise itself on this game
that 79% possibility sometimes changes very, very fast.
But if you look at the situation in a point of time, it seems very realistic
that thatís the greatest possibility.
What happened was that people, very smart people, began to figure out that
something big was coming up...
something that made it so all the future possibilities and all the future scenarios of any choice,
any possibility, that was fed in and observed
through the Looking Glass inherently ended up in the same future.
And no decision, no possibility, changed past a certain point.
Thatís the big secret.
Okay, so is that certain 2012, in your understanding?
It well coincides with December 21, 2012.
So at that point all possibilities lead to the sameÖ
Timeline. All possible timelines lead to the same basic set of history in the future.
And what is that history? Did you know that, or did you find that out?
That is the big question.
That is the big secret. That is what sends
everybody that has all of the information, that knows everything, into a blind panic.
The people that know everything about Looking Glass that have gotten all the reports and all the information...
the ìElitesî of the world?
probably figured out that that was the end of the game.
Nothing could be manipulated beyond that point.
So do you think thatís held true? In other words, well, I have about 60 questions, but
but do you think thatís true, or holding true,
that nothing could be manipulated, that they havenít found a way to manipulate,
that thatís still the case?
I mean, this is knowledge that you would have gained back when?
Back when I was in the military -- it would have been before í97, when I got in trouble
it was things that, um...
One of my particular areas that I was
amazingly intuitive about is problem solving/mission planning,
or more specifically, taking a bad mission
and fixing it, getting everybody through and out of it.
Troubleshooting an optimum future.
Exactly. Certainly knowing how
String Theory and possible futures works
makes it so you can work your mind very quickly to
see the reality of whatís happening and decide
what decisions need to be made to change it for a particular outcome.
Okay, but at a certain point you said that even the Powers That Be, so to speak,
realized that having even abilities such as yourself youíre talking about,
which they in theory had, even using a computer or Looking Glass...
- Right, they had to use a computer to do it. - Right.
So in essence...
but at a certain point itís still an end-game;
itís still they cannot go beyond a certain point.
At a certain point, after theyíre done hearing the computer tell them:
This is whatís going to happen over and over and over and over again,
all they become focused on is: How do we fix it?
Why? What is this thatís going to happen? Do you know that?
The inevitable contraction of the timelines.
The...
But what does that mean for this reality? Do you know that?
I donít know that.
What I do know is that I was called in
and asked to solve this problem,
this timeline contraction problem.
I eventually did my due diligence, did all the investigating, and
basically, only had one piece of information, and that was reinforcement: The computerís right.
The timelines will contract down to some inevitable thing that
you guys wonít tell me about, so I canít help you.
But what basically you came back with was: It is inevitable.
There is an inevitable event.
Itís been forecast; itís been predicted; itís been
fed to us in a slop trough of what
they want us to believe will happen...
- But they donít actually know? - ...however, they donít...
actually have control over what happens.
They only have control over the reaction
and it seems that no matter what they try to
do to cause their desired reaction, itís going to have...
an opposite effect?
Interesting.
Now,
itís much, much easier for me to explain today
what that process is, as opposed to back then.
But... If I had to give it a name, I would say itís the awakening process.
Itís an evolution of consciousness that cannot, will not...
and no matter what decisions or possibilities are injected into the equation,
eventually, it all resolves down to us all
learning the truth.
nd becoming aware of
this massive dam of lies that has been built
that keep us from knowing
a massive volume of information that we should otherwise possess.
Okay! Well, thatís very, very monumental
to be told that from a person in your perspective,
whoís had your background and your exposure.
Is it your understanding that
the notion that Looking Glass has been...
You know that there are various Looking Glasses around the globe, supposedly,
that according to Dan Burisch were shut down.
Is it your understanding theyíre actually not shut down?
I believe that theyíre shut down because
they are all saying the same thing and theyíre...
- theyíre completely useless at this point. Right. - So itís like theyíre redundant, is what youíre saying.
Right. Itís like the Wicked Witch, you know,
looking into the Magic Mirror and always getting the same answer.
Well, if you were always getting the exact opposite of the answer that you wanted,
youíd stop talking to the mirror, and thatís essentially what happened with Looking Glass.
Itís no longerÖ
not only did they not want people to use it anymore because they knew it was just going to burp out the same thing,
but at the same time, they didnít want anybody else to know what it was saying, Iím SURE.
- Because they would lose control, in essence. - Because that information...
was of monumental concern
when I was in the military, about how
to prevent this inevitability. Now, at first, I thought it was end of the world.
Now I see end of the world as end of THEIR world.
Well said!
Okay. But are you aware, do you know the difference
between Looking Glass and the Yellow Cube?
Yes.
Okay. Do you... are you aware of what happened to the Yellow Cube and how it was used, and so on?
I believe that the Yellow Cube still exists.
I canít say for certain if itís on this planet, but I would say that itís definitely
protected from use at this point.
Okay, well that coincides with the testimony we got.
Can you also verify that leaders ofÖ
But let me say one thing about the Yellow Book
and its differences with Looking Glass.
The Yellow Cube or the Yellow Book
- would give you your possible future. - Yes.
So it took
basically the choices that you would inherently make along a timeline and tell you
what that timeline would be, given you that made all the choices that your brain would make.
Well this is exactly what I was just going to ask you.
What we were told is that leaders of governments and so on,
people in high places, you know politically,
would use this to try to see their most optimum future and then follow thoseÖ
so they were using it to enhance their wealth, etcetera, etcetera...
...in a very egotistical way,
and that was part of the problem with it...
...and that supposedly one of the specific things, we are told,
had to do with Hillary. Are you aware of any of that?
You mean the 2012 prediction for her?
Well, you tell me what you know.
I donít have any firsthand knowledge of this. This is all...
back-alley information.
But...
One of the last predictions that was
put out by the Yellow Cube was that for all intents and purposes
and this is just my level of understanding -- is that Hillary Clinton would be president in 2012.
And...
And when the Yellow Cube is involved,
it leads me to question what I know about Looking Glass and String Theory along with that.
The first question that anybody that knew anything about the process would know is:
- Who was using the Cube... - Right.
...when it made that prediction? If I knew that, then I could tell you
why it would predict what it predicted.
Wasnít there also an issue with,
Iím not sure, but in using the Yellow Cube, Yellow Book, however you want to term it,
that they actually had to use it through an intuitive who had a high vibration,
had to be in the vicinity to, in a sense, be the go-between,
between the person who wanted to use the Cube and the Cube itself...
...because, normally, they didnít have the vibration necessary?
Correct. And...
that is a process that would prevent anomalies from popping out in predictions.
- But it wouldnít completelyÖ - No and Iíll tell you why.
If it was used properly by somebody that
knew how to use it and could eliminate
their thought process from the machineís effective use,
it would be very easy to get an exact, you know, what future holds.
However, anybody that has that ability
would inherently know that that information could not be given and would be protected,
and that inherent notion
would inject something into the Yellow Cube or the Yellow Book that would give an inaccurate statementÖ
just by the person thatís using its intuition saying:
If I tell the truth, itíll be bad.
So, the higher levels pick up on that and throw out a different scenario...
- that isnít the truth. - Right.
In a sense, the feedback loop gets dirtied somewhere along the line by exposure.
And thatís why those pieces of technology should have never been used
by humanity at its current level of understanding because,
for all intents and purposes, the technology doesnít work right
when we use it.
Right. I totally get that.
Okay, so to get back to Looking Glass
and the possible futures and that they do converge.
And the notion ofÖ is there anything else that you can tell us,
that you would want to tell us about that and the rest of the laundry list of
sort of, information that you had directed to you for yourself
or through someone that you had vetted?
The biggest cherry on top of all this conversation
would be a synopsis to say that
if I could convince everybody out there that
for all intents and purposes, what we believe to be TRUE
eventually becomes TRUE.
If somebody convinces us
that a major disasterís going to happen in the very near future,
a major disaster happens in the very near future.
If we donít buy into that fear
and accept that there is really nothing that we know-know is going to happen,
and accept whatever happens,
that makes the convergence of the timelines happen as naturally as possible.
Any attempts to try to go away from this one inevitable conclusion...
I, again, see as a new beginning,
an end of this reality, the beginning of something that
we canít even possibly understand, based on the level of our beliefs currently.
But when all that information comes flooding out,
there is going to be no denying whatís true and whatís a lie, or whatís illusion.
We wonít have the choice to believe that
9/11 happened because of a bunch of terrorists, because weíll know exactly whatís happened.
Basically what weíre experiencing right now is
two master chess players sitting at the board.
And one of them looks down at the board and sees that heís in checkmate in seven moves,
and he looks across at his opponent and he knows that his opponent sees it too, so thereís no getting out of it.
So at this point, the loser can only prolong the game.
Both players know the game is over.
Itís only a matter of time before he does this,
and then youíre forced to do this, and then heís forced to do this and eventually: checkmate!
We, as a race... if we could understand that the game is over!
Based on the rules of the game,
the bad guys have already lost; the good guys have already won.
Yes, thereíre moves left on the table, but
those moves are being forced
by the player that is going to win.
The only way that checkmate canít happen is if the player thatís winning makes a mistake.
But from all the information that Iíve gathered,
all of the information thatís been given,
all the information thatís been vetted to me,
it seems pretty obvious that
the good-guy player on the side of the chessboard knows exactly what hasto be done to win the game.
And so at this point any mistake would be all but impossible.
But again, you really have to understand the game to know that
the guy thatís losing has lost.
And Iím sure most people sitting watching the chess match between two advanced chess players
know the gameís over long after the two players know itís over,
because they canít see the board and see that thereís only 7 moves left.
Okay, but when we come to this convergence and...
again, youíve seen or
the Looking Glass has seen up to that pointÖ
Now let me say, why I believe that it comes down to one inevitability
is because I was entrusted in getting it down to two possibilities,
and Iíve heard both of those possibilities talked about
in massive proportions, the good and the bad.
Okay, can you in one sentence say what the good was and the bad was?
Or, are you able to do that?
- Ah... to most easily put it to people? - I suppose.
One scenario is what most people would understand to be ascension,
or an evolution of consciousness that
brings us out of the cocoon and turns us into a butterfly.
Timeline Two is some kind of major global nuke catastrophe that
drives most of us underground and leaves a few of us on top to fend for ourselves.
Very well put. Okay, so I would imagine and you canÖ
But I would also like to point it out that they call Timeline Two, Timeline TWO.
It seemed very odd to me that, even back then, it was identified as NOT ONE.
- And then One... - Okay...
- One is the ascension oneÖ - And ONE didnít get talked about.
One is the one that involves what, in essence, would be
ascension or moving into, you know, from the cocoon to the butterfly.
Okay...
But I believe, based on what youíre telling me, that they would have used a lot of people like you
that had a proclivity for being able to see the future...
you know, to be what is a sort of advanced psychic, remote viewer, or whatever you want to call that...
and Looking Glass
to posit these potential futures,
to go up to that point and to view it; and that youíre just one of many.
- Mm hm. I would agree. And - Wouldnít you agree?
back in 1991, when I began my little adventure in the military,
I would say that it was pretty obvious that there wasnít very many of us.
However, go 20 years into the future and
you find out that itís coming to the point where thereíre a lot of people
that have that ability, that are inherently realizing that ability and
are able through some unknown,
extraordinary means to develop that ability inside themselves
without any outside help or assistance.
And...
itís quite obvious that,
as far as advanced intellectual abilities,
as far as simple intelligence levels and
cognitive skills, the human race has increased exponentially in the past 20 years.
And...
People that were 10 years old in 1991
are now 30 years old and fully awake and conscious of this
burning inside that says,
ìI am a lot more than what I see in the mirror.î
Absolutely.
Okay. I do have a question
in regard to what the military-industrial complex has been working on,
because with the knowledge that you say they have,
assuming that they have this level of knowledge that youíre talking about, right?
In other words, of the timelines converging and the fact that there was going to be somethingÖ
And I donít know if you saw the movie or TV show Fast ForwardÖ
Öbut thereíve been so many possible, you know, scenarios in that regard.
But one of the things that goes on is they are very busy
building underground bases, supposedly underground cities.
And so, they seem to be hedging their bets for the negative timeline...
...and putting their emphasis there.
And would you say that that is because theyÖ I mean,
why would someone want something negative to come true?
Well, of course the Illuminati have a program that theyíre working on in that regard,
but basically the sort of well-meaning military that just goes after contingencies...
...you know, and is just working towards a future that they want to prevent
and/or deal with when it comes.
Can you explain why they have been hedging their bets to such a degree on the negative?
Itís very simple:
Theyíre insane.
And beyond insane, they have literally deluded themselves into believing
that they can, somehow, manage to get away with what theyíre trying to get away with.
There is a distinct lack of reality in that thinking.
Okay. What about the notion that CERN, for example,
is engaged in trying to beat that game, as you call it?
I would say -- look at the problems CERN has had
the crazy little things that have kept that project from moving forward.
Certainly they have never even come close to getting that project to the level that
they want it to be, to do what they really want to do with it.
Okay. Well, what about the notion that thatís the party line,
that they havenít been able to do so?
But if you really think about it, thatís what they would prefer people to believe
so that they donít think that thereís a threat.
But, when you
listen to the interviews of the scientists that are working on the project,
even they say that it seems like somebody or something from the future
wonít let them get that project up,
and the craziest little things have caused massive damage to that project.
And when you
get the foremost thinker in String Theory saying:
Yeah, I donít think we are going to do it, because I donít think Fate wants us to do it
that says something about a scientist.
Okay. So...
well, thank you very much. I think that
at this point weíre going to have to close this down unless thereíre any other
things that you think that we havenít covered
or that we could possibly touch on that you want out there.
No, I donít think weíd get any further tonight.
Certainly from what I know, the questions will come out
and Iíd be more than happy to do a live feed after that,
and answer any questions that anybody comes up with from this interview.
Wonderful.
All right, well thank you very much,
Bill Wood, for your service to humanity.
Well, hopefully I can get everybody else working towards that goal as well.
Absolutely. Well, apparently regardless of which way they work,
the convergence will happen.
Yeah.
Thereís a certain element of pain that we can reduce by just not accepting that
we donít have choices in the matter
and sitting back and waiting for the aliens to fix everything. It isnít going to help.
Absolutely.
If we are inevitably coming to a rise in consciousness,
we should start trying to elevate our consciousness as fast as humanly possible
and make that transition a lot easier when it comes.