Missouri Bill Redefines Science, Pushes Intelligent Design

in america the fight over the teaching of creationism or intelligent design the classroom is never really far away we see popping up across the south even sometimes in states like pennsylvania i think it's happened in wisconsin uh... but one of the good things for people who don't want to tell of designing talking public schools is that the proponents of creationism uh... often are very creative in terms of how they present it's usually just you know you have to teach the debate or whatever they pretend to be uh... but unfortunately they're starting to get a bit more creative i'm speaking particularly here about uh... missouri representative patrick brands in the state government and he has a very interesting strategy for how he wants to introduce intelligent design into the classroom and that is by simply changing the definitions of every word that has to do it science basically so we've got some fun definitions for you were to start with the definition of scientific theory according to regret in who has multiple p_h_d_'s i have to assume but not the actual willfully are now at yet as though he defines scientific theory out like this it's and infra-red explanation of incompletely understood phenomena about the physical universe based on limited knowledge whose components are dado lives have been faith-based foster thing while since exactly okay let's go out hypothesis and you'll understand why and the fighting in this way uh... once we get to the end of this i hate the a scientific theory again he's complaining about this is a very uh... reflecting a minority of scientific opinion which may lack acceptance because it is a new idea contains faulty logic lack supporting data has significant amounts of conflicting data scores philosophically unpopular so there is trying to define hypothesis in a way that it basically only could mean creationism but i love it is like preemptively admitting that contains faulty logic black supporting data has significant amounts of conflicting data and in a very first few words of that definition to show you how much of a crowd he is hypothesis mysterio are two different things exactly yeah and ash i'd love that he's taking insult seriously here and he's making a total four out of himself what is the prevail campus i mean it's working there and to keep dialing yet for the third definition we've got for you this is standard science which he defines that's knowledge disclosed in a truthful an objective manner and the physical universe without any preconceived philosophical demands concerning origin our destiny now why did you talk about origin of destiny here here's why he goes on in this is actually in the bill it says biological identity intelligent design is taught if it's taught any proposed identity of the intelligence responsible for mildly shelby verifiable by present-day observation or experimentation antisocial not question survey or otherwise influence student belief in a non verifiable identity within a science course now that may sound kind of reasonable flood we're not gonna push you know the the biblical gotta give but it's also making it so that they can't say isn't the villain biblical god talking about this would you want your children growing up in missouri schools of the sort of past no i wouldn't want my children growing up in missouri schools and even if it didn't pass uh... talking about it head of the sorry and i don't want to start with now dozens and i love people of missouri i wanna remained here in los angeles and that's not to say that misery schools are bad or you can be the alley usd is a complete and utter nightmare so i'd just don't wanna have kids because i was subjected to the some participation that we have here in the u_s_ but that's beside the point isaiah i'd appreciate him trying to be creative in nag getting creationism in schools but as uh... we have talked about on the second hour before there even have to get creative in states like texas our public schools are already teaching the bible to students and originally bs elective classes were meant to be uh... you know just unless it about the bible and not have religious indoctrination but as we reported now it is a religious in our indoctrination because they're teaching kids that everything that you're reading in the bible is the truth you know and and you should believe this and there's there's no question that we were i you know created by intelligent design and is not so so it's a real problem because you're seeing this assault on our public education not just when it comes to curriculum but also when it comes to finding and we have to stop being asleep at the wheel we need to wake up because these kids are future and we're basically training uh... nation and its in the future and we can't we can't let this continue to happen and trying to train them to be even better that better idiots in the future uh... i think book do you have a choice in this country who you can allow to be influenced your young children when it comes to learning scientifically that you can have regretted in missouri or maybe you could have done my you'll depressed i said men like this in a little bit more about the definitions of these words and rick run i think it's unfortunate i don't know like the scopes monkey trial for like a thousand years ago when are we gonna stop this debating this two things i wish that he had grown up watching bill night maybe we wouldn't have this problem