Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
There’s one thing about Zakir Naik
that makes people really think
that he knows what he’s talking about,
and that’s when he’s able to share facts,
randomly,
and very quickly
from the top of his head
in such a manner that makes you think,
wow, he’s a very intelligent man.
But a friend of mine sat down
and went through a five minute talk of his once,
and in that five minutes,
he was able to make
over 25 mistakes.
Charles Darwin went on an island by the name of Keletropist
There is no such island as the
Keletropist” islands anywhere.
It was actually the Galapagos Islands
that Darwin visited
where he found finches.
and there he found birds pecking at niches.
These finches do not “peck at niches
as Naik says.
They lived in separate ecological niches
Depending upon the ecological niches they peck,
the beaks kept on becoming long and short.
The differences Darwin observed
between these finches
were far more than simply beak length,
they included differences in color,
size, mating behavior,
songs,
and preferred food.
This observation was made in the same species, not in different species.
Darwin’s observations of varying beaks
were made on fourteen different species of finches,
not just one as Dr Naik claims.
The beak length actually
did not vary within the species.
Charles Darwin wrote a letter to his friend, Thomas Thromtan,
All of Darwin’s published correspondence
is printed
and even available electronically online,
and it contains no record
of anyone named Thomas Thromtan,
Charles Darwin himself said that there were missing links,
he did not agree with it,
Darwin admitted that there were missing links,
but that does not mean
he disagreed with his own theory—
he simply predicted where the missing links would be found.
the reason is because that if you analyze the church,
the church was against science previously.
The church was never against science---
almost all the great European scientists
of Galileo’s time,
including Galileo,
were devout Christians.
People like Newton, Copernicus, Kepler,
Boyle, Linnaeus, Pascal
were all committed believers in the Bible.
And you know the incident that they sentenced Galileo to death;
they sentenced Galileo to death.
Galileo,
a devout Catholic,
was never sentenced to death.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment
on June 22, 1633
and then that sentence
was commuted to house arrest.
He died more than eight years later
on the evening of January 8,
1642
of old age.
Galileo believed
that his theories fit with the Bible,
and he wrote a book arguing this
based on early interpretations
of Christians like Augustine.
Naik goes on to make the same false statement
two more times,
but let's only count it as one factual error.
so all the scientists, most of them,
they supported the theory because it went against the Bible,
not because it was true.
Actually, most scientists
did not support Darwin’s theory
for many years,
and most of these same scientists
revered the Bible.
Basically,
this account by Dr. Naik
is a total fabrication.
All the stages— there were four "homonites,"
Everything Dr. Naik says here is wrong.
There is no such word as “homonites.
He must mean hominids.
Science tells us today that there were four "homonites."
There are not a mere “four” hominids,
there are
at least fourteen.
First is "Lucy" along with its guy [sic] Dosnopytichest,
There is no such hominid as “dosnopytchest.
Lucy was an
Australopithecus afarensis.
which died about 3 and ½ million years (the Ice Age).
The ice age was not 3 1/3 million years ago.
It was between 1.6 million years
and 10,000 years ago.
Then next came the *** sapiens
who died out about five hundred thousand years ago.
*** sapiens did not die out 500 thousand years ago.
You and I and even Zakir Naik
are *** sapiens
Then came the "Neanderthal Man,"
According to evolutionary theory
Neanderthal man was not
on the direct line to modern man,
but an ice-age offshoot.
who dies a hundred to forty thousand years ago.
Neanderthal man went extinct
30 thousand years ago,
not “a hundred to forty thousand years ago.
Then came the fourth stage, the "CroMagnon;
Cro-Magnon man is the same thing
as *** Sapiens,
which Naik had mentioned
as a different earlier species.
there is no link at all between these stages.
Actually,
evolutionary biologists have found many examples
of what they claim to be links
between these stages,
for example
*** habilis,
*** ergaster,
and *** heidelbergensis.
If you know of Sir Albert Georgie,
who got the Nobel Prize for inventing the vitamin C,
Györgyi didn’t invent Vitamin C, he discovered it.
Vitamin C is a naturally occurring substance
that doesn’t need to be invented.
he wrote the book, "The Crazy Ape and Man" against Darwin's theory.
Albert Szent-Györgyi’s book was not called
The Crazy Ape and Man
but simply
The Crazy Ape,
and it was not a refutation of evolution
but a sociological commentary.
If you know about Ruperts Albert
Who is Ruperts Albert?
I can find no trace of anybody
with that name.
If you know about Whitemeat, Sir Whitemeat,
Whitemeat? Who is Sir Whitemeat?
For the fourth time,
no trace can be found of anybody wirh this name.
At lower levels an amoeba at the lower species level
amoeba can change to parameshia.
There is no such thing as a “paremishia.
Perhaps he means paramecium.
But the evolutionary change of an amoeba
to a paramecium
is far more dramatic biologically
than the relatively small
biological difference between apes and humans
According to Henses Crake who is an authority in this field
he said, "It is unimaginable."
There is no such person as “Henses Crake.
Naik probably means Francis Crick,
the co-discoverer of DNA.
Francis Crick believes fully in evolution.