Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
OCTOBER BROUGHT THE
TRADITIONAL START OF THE NEW
TERM FOR THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT. THE
JUSTICES ARE SCHEDULED TO TAKE
3 EL PRIMER LUNES EN OCTUBRE
TRAJO EL PRINCIPIO TRADICIONAL
DEL NUEVO TéRMINO PARA LA
THIS TERM. ONE OF THE
FIRST INVOLVES AFFIRMATIVE
TEXAS.
THE NINE JUSTICES OF THE U-S
UNO DE LOS PRIMEROS IMPLICA LA
ACCIóN AFIRMATIVA EN
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS.
NEW TERM ON MONDAY..
3 LOS 9 JUECES DEL US LA CORTE
NUEVO TéRMINO EL
LUNES.
ONE CASE THE COURT WILL HEAR
INVOLVES THE PRACTICE OF
ADMISSIONS.ABIGAIL FISHER SUED
AFTER SHE WAS REJECTED BY THE
..
(S/ ABIGAIL FISHER -
PLAINTIFF :22 - :30)"THERE
IMPLICA LA PRáCTICA DE
CONSIDERAR LA CARRERA PARA
WERE PEOPLE IN MY CLASS WITH
ADMISIONES DE COLEGIO.
ALL THE ACTIVITIES I WAS IN,
EL PESCADOR DE ABIGAIL DEMANDó
WHO WERE ACCEPTED INTO UT. AND
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US
DESPUéS DE QUE ELLA FUE
SAY STUDENTS ARE BETTER
PREPARED BY A MORE DIVERSE
EXPERIENCE.
(S/ ELISE BODDIE - NAACP
:44)"THE BEST WAY TO GET TO
RACIAL DIVERSITY IS TO
RECHAZADA POR UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS EN AUSTIN.
INDIVIDUALIZED WAY THAT LOOKS
AT THE WHOLE APPLICANT."
(NATS: CLINTON SIGNING DOMA)
PRáCTICA DICEN QUE LOS
ESTUDIANTES ESTáN MEJOR
PREPARADOS POR UNA EXPERIENCIA
ESCOLAR MáS DIVERSA.
EL MEJOR MODO PARA PONERSE A LA
STATES THAT THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ONLY RECOGNIZE
CONSIDERAR LA CARRERA DE UN
MODO INDIVIDUALIZADO QUE MIRA
LA DEFENSA DE ACTO DE
TRADITIONAL MARRIAGES ..
MEANING NO FEDERAL BENEFITS ..
EVEN WHERE SAME SEX-MARRIAGE
MATRIMONIO FIRMADO POR EL
LEGAL.
BILL CLINTON .
LA LEY DECLARA QUE EL GOBIERNO
MATRIMONIOS TRADICIONALES.
(S/ JON DAVIDSON - GAY RIGHTS
ADVOCATE 1:01 - 1:09)
"SAME-SEX COUPLES ARE DENIED
HUNDREDS OF DIFFERENT RIGHTS
AND BENEFITS THAT ARE PROVIDED
TO MARRIED DIFFERENT-SEX
:09ON THE DOCKET AS WELL ..
WHETHER TO CURTAIL PARTS OF
THE HISTORIC VOTING RIGHTS ACT
OF 1965.IT MANDATES FEDERAL
HISTORY OF VOTING
FEDERALES.
LEGAL.
NIEGAN A LAS PAREJAS DEL MISMO
SEXO CIENTOS DE DERECHOS
DIFERENTES Y VENTAJAS QUE SON
PROPORCIONADAS A PAREJAS
OVERSIGHT FOR STATES WITH A
CHANGING ANY RULES FOR
CONFORME A LA LEY FEDERAL.
SI HAY QUE REDUCIR PARTES DEL
LAW IS OUTDATED AND
HISTóRICO DE 1965,IT
COURT)A BIG LINE-UP OF CASES
ENCOMIENDA EL DESCUIDO FEDERAL
.. THAT COULD CHANGE THE
PARA ESTADOS CON UNA HISTORIA