Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
in unit five (NOTE: should be unit 6) this week we're going to look at
Islamic law or Sharia, as well as some practices of the Islamic Sufi
mystical sect of the faith. I thought I would talk a little bit about the courts
of law
in Islam. The application of Islamic law
was the task of the Sharia Courts and their judges
who were called qadis, The judiciary
was not independent because judges were paid
and they served at the pleasure of the Caliph.
Originally, judges had been
interpreters and makers of law, but their role
would come to be restricted to the application of existing law.
Sharia judges were not to interpret
or add to the law; thus, Islamic law does not recognize
a case law system of legally binding precedents.
This reflected the belief that jurists,
not judges, would interpret the law. Judges were organized under
a chief judge appointed by the Caliph. They were assisted in their work
by experts or legal consultants called
muftis. Among the notable
judicial procedures were 3 that I'm going to mention.
One, rules of evidence that required the use of an
oath sworn before God in the absence of two to
adult male Muslim witnesses to the crime.
Secondly, the exclusion
of circumstantial evidence; and third,
the absence of cross-examination of witnesses.
Legal decisions are final - no appeals!
The ulama were the backbone of
the legal system. While these scholars were experts
in a number of fields. Many specialized in law. A specialist in law,
or jurist, was called a faqih.
They dominated the Sharia system serving as lawyers, teachers, judges,
and muftis. The sharia system limited the powers of
strong and often autocratic leaders. The Caliph's desire
to exercise absolute power, though, clashed
with the belief that God was the only lawmaker. An Islamic rationale
was then created to circumvent the problem. Citing the Caliph's
obligation to uphold and ensure
governance according to the Sharia, the Umayyads
asserted broad discretionary legislative and judicial powers.
They issued administrative ordinances
and created grievance courts, ostensibly
to enhance the proper administration and implementation
of the Sharia into the society. Carefully avoiding the term
"the law," government regulations
were called ordinances. The only requirement was that they not be
contrary to the Sharia.
In terms of Sufism,
during the Umayyad era, many Muslims became
disaffected, such as the Kharijites
and the Alids. There were critics that contrasted
and idealized Medinan Islamic
community with the realities of the Umayyad way of life
which they thought had been corrupted.
This gave rise to two Islamic movements or institutions,
the ulama and the Sufi mystics,
For a growing number of pious Muslims,
excess of the Empire contributed to the development of
mysticism, as well is to law
that was interpreted by the ulama, luxury,
the pursuit of conquest and wealth, the transformation of the Caliphate
into a dynastic monarchy
with the trappings of imperial court life, and
and the moral character of some Umayyad caliphs, and
the relative simplicity of life in Medina.