Ciara Falls to Future in Court - Tmz tv

>> HEY, CIARA, HOW ARE YOU? ANNOUNCER: NOT GOOD. >> HOW DID EVERYTHING GO? ANNOUNCER: YOU MEAN IN COURT WHERE SHE TRIED TO GET SOLE CUSTODY OF HER CHILD INSTEAD OF JOINT CUSTODY WITH HER BABY DADDY FUTURE? IT WENT BAD. >> DID EVERYTHING GO OK? ANNOUNCER: NO! IT SUCKED! IT BLEW! THE JUDGE IS NOT FEELING HER. STOP ASKING IF ANYTHING WENT OK BECAUSE IT DOES NOT! >> CIARA AND FUTURE IN COURT FOR CUSTODY. FUTURE WANTED JOINT CUSTODY BUT CIARA SAID HE WAS AN UNFIT PARENT. ANNOUNCER: YES, APPARENTLY CIARA PUT ON THE FULL-COURT PRESS, JUDICIAL JOKE, TELLING THE JUDGE NOT ONLY IT FUTURE NEVER SEE THEIR SON BUT ALSO -- >> A LOT OF TRASH TALK JUST ABOUT BEING A BAD PERSON. >> I HATE WHEN I HEAR THESE STORIES BECAUSE I'M LIKE HE WAS A BAD PERSON WHEN YOU HAD SEX WITH HIM AND HAD A BABY WITH HIM. YOU CHOSE THAT BAD GUY. ANNOUNCER: AND NOW NOT ONLY IS CIARA WANTING TO LIMIT'S FUTURE'S CUSTODY, SHE'S STILL SUING HIM FOR $15 MILL FOR IMPLYING SHE'S A BAD MOTHER. ALL IN ALL, SHE WANTS HIS HYDE. HARVEY: WHO WON? >> HE WON ACTUALLY. CALIFORNIA LAW FAVORS JOINT CUSTODY AND THE JUDGE SAW NO REASON WHY THEY CAN'T HAVE JOINT CUSTODY. ANNOUNCER: YEP. SO LUCKY BABY FUTURE WILL GET TO SPEND EQUAL TIME HEARING EACH PARENT TALK SMACK ABOUT THE OTHER ONE. HARVEY: CAN RUSSELL WILSON STEP UP AND BE THE PEACEMAKER IN THIS THING? ANNOUNCER: ALL PRO QUARTERBACK AND CIARA'S FIANCEE RUSSELL WILSON. WHAT A GREAT IDEA. >> THAT'S THE WORST IDEA! ANNOUNCER: BECAUSE FUTURE THINKS HE MAY NOT BE, SHALL WE SAY, IMPARTIAL? HARVEY: MAYBE THE PARTIALITY IS FOR PEADS. >> CIARA IS LIKE YOU HATE HIM TOO AND I WILL TAKE MY CLOTHES OFF. >> IMPARTIALITY NEUTRALIZED. ANNOUNCER: SO GOOD LUCK, BABY FUTURE, BECAUSE YOUR FUTURE LOOKS A LITTLE ROCKY.