Candidates@google Ron Paul Part 8 Greek Subtitles

key issues and ways the government how government to get out of technology in ways in which the mansion courage and more innovation and technology for example what do you think that network neutrality you have an opinion on that what you think is correct copyright and patent live give an opinion about other technology issues yes I want the least amount of government net neutrality I think is regulation that would lead to control a I don't support that I want to protect the marketplace and the creativity and marketplace I want things to be developed and I'm someone like yeah %uh that cell phones have been developed and distributed can you imagine if we had turned that over to fema to have an organization twenty years ago is that your job is to make sure everybody in this country including poor people have sell about until we do that then the FCC's of regulate year when well probably more so than they need to I think they should go out everyone's broadcasting dealt with the manufacture sale for the navy and drive the price down and then make them available just about everybody in this country but I want a government out of it you know whether it's energy or technology or what not politicians and bureaucrats aren't smart enough to make those kind of decisions believe that I know if you all the market got to make these decisions so for example the current debate about the use of a seven hundred stomach hurts spectrum you know what role should to them it's a we're not going to regulate according to a letter your honor I don't know that's very interesting questions that you could go back to the nineteen twenties and radio frequencies they should have all been sold the sugar property rights ending so we have a new property rights in a new and different but the idea of my singers is is very anti free markets and resume %uh intimidate you the license had been revoked in fairness doctrine is to be concerned about in all these these other issues so I'm a little more government has in essence its best its best function is disposing of it and that is right and this is Al for and and make it available in the most equitable fashion and I I would agree some of those are the only issue special because in every person I mean I don't understand all this technology but the principle %uh the %uh the personal the marketplace would be defined it in and privatize it and and have the court's available to it to make sure these contracts but gave no special benefits to monopolies winning the these licenses you know the game and all the sound and and that's that's the promise of miscommunication here now your telephone communications they come about throughout more power the story come in from the government so well you can't have you really can't have monopolies and cartels we have some type of government protection that was the railroads long time ago where with its communications and our utilities the they do the common operates that true monopolies can occur in a free market usually almost always occur with government assistance and if a company gets very very busy they have ninety nine percent of the market it is truly free get a free entry to the marketplace the only candidate because they're set aside the consumer and they drive prices down and if prices go up to minors free entry somebody's going to come along and and may catch you know so the we what we wanted on of the integrity of the marketplace and freedom because that's where the creativity is is that release the creative energy of individuals you don't have much creative energy under socialism he didn't have it in the Soviet union and it's available in this country we have a lot of freedom laughter I but a lot about underpinnings have been eroded you know whether such civil liberties that when it's a runaway more the weather this intrusion of our privacy a and the elimination of habeas corpus all these attacks they haven't really heard it yet %uh economically I think we're more vulnerable because %uh we're %uh we're basing our economy on on borrowed money if we get somebody even more authoritarian and our current President they have way too many powers on the books now they can rule us from day one that is one of things that on fighting to stop next question houston so that's a constitutional rights and this is I understand the prosecution objected bill of rights much of this is undercut the minority from the tyranny of the majority what role do you think of them she we played cards protecting the minority from the journey into germany's I think that it's always the greatest threat and %uh it's a it's been threats it was been threatened by days since day one and a he in many ways you know I will at times carelessly use the word democracy but it's really not a very good word because democracy implies a tyranny of the majority so %uh an unfortunate we're at that point now if you get fifty one percent of the vote to transfer wealth %uh it's the law of the land and I'm really what we want to protect is the minority of the first amendment %uh it doesn't up protect %uh as speech it is no one controversial it protects a speech to the one or two or three percent not only will lifestyles that controversial religious years or political his *** abuse so when I defend the second of the first amendment by not curtailing some things that we might personally consider hardly I do it on principle not because I'm course when three people who but what we want to do is protect this out %uh this %uh issue that you're you're talking about so that the majority never can take away the rights of the minority are there any specific government functions that he believed are necessary to do so in order to I've got to run the government to to protect the minority I guess the minority I guess and that is to protect the individual the individual is the true minority have been docked in a collective sense I think that's it we go off on a tangent when we think of ourselves as a only a collective right and that means that we have to add we state the principle of the constitution that is %uh it's never there to restrain the people the constitution is a restraining government from doing anything against the individual Bob packwood question just follow up on something earlier about technology how would you insure that the US states competitive in and technological innovation and and you can begin to answer their specific year was would you reduce funding for such organizations as the national science foundation and the national institutes of health I in a perfect world he asked that of course you know the least one of the least offensive things and I mean we don't need to do that we would be %uh you know on the prosecution side somebody's going to and to find those and and the way you could notice it's an eighty one international competitiveness you just get out of the way I mean make sure your taxes I want to make sure that something he wants to start a business in kenya make sure that that they get to keep their money make sure that the regulations are of make sure they ought to go through hoops to start a new business I'm a businessman come to me the other day he had been to China an indicted businessman over their know he was a journalist and that none of this is that he said we don't understand just what did you do that back in California he says he would take me five years it took me three weeks to get his business started in China true at women in the way and we we we push people overseas that's also very much involved with the monetary system because we have the reserve currency and we get a better bargain by I never cease to be delivery courage exports and that's a little bit more complicated by it's a to the regulations that strangle taxation as monetary we change the things we could be more competitive the we don't become more competitive by subsidizing certain industries we don't want to as subsidize your competitor you know that's