[Mysterious white smoke]

[Mysterious white smoke] In the ensuing event, as seen from various photographs, white smoke gushed out separately from the plane crash. Also from this video, white smoke rose upwards at ground level before the collapse. How could there be smoke at the 1st-floor area? Also in this video, did these mysterious white smokes just pop out from the lower floors seconds before the floors even collapsed? Here, here. White smokes randomly popped out, as seen. What could these really be? A physicist has solved this mystery, then professor of Brigham Young University, Steven Jones. In an interview he recounted his finding. "The molten metal in the basement of all three buildings? And yet, all the scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel. So, what is this molten metal? It is a direct evidence for the use of a high-temperature explosive such as thermite." "explosive such as thermite" Thermite, an incendiary mainly used by the U.S. military, is a compound of iron oxide and aluminum. It instantly burns up close to 2,500 C when ignited, which, with such chemical properties, is sufficient to melt steel. Firefighters at the scene have made this eyewitness account. "... molten steel, molten steel running down the channel rails, like you're in a foundry, like lava, like volcano." Also, as seen from this picture a molten metal-like substance is pouring from the 81st floor of the South Tower. Moreover, the steel pillars at the scene seem to have been laced with similar molten-metal-like substance. But no matter how many times it has been said, office fires are not hot enough to melt steel. However, if it is assumed that some sort of explosives was used, then the case of melting iron and the white smokes in mid-collapse will be wholly explained. But, if explosives had been placed-in, then who did it and why did they commit this hideous act? Let's consider some of these facts for the answer. [Was the WTC a liability?] The construction of the Twin Towers was completed in year 1973. For many years it was managed by the Port Authority as public organization. However it was a huge white elephant even on maintenance alone. Also, tenancy continued to drop in this poorly reputed 30-year-old facility. Furthermore, this building was constructed with the hazardous material asbestos. It would cost over a billion to remove it all. Could the towers be really this problematic liability? [Was a huge amount of money transferred in connection with the attack?] Only 6 weeks before the attack, the Twin-Tower lease was handed-over from the longtime owner Port Authority to the real estate tycoon Larry Silverstein. As he had insured the towers by 3.5 billion dollars, after 9/11 he collected his insurance claim in total of 8.05 billion dollars. [Mysterious renovation work and power-down] Scott Forbes who worked at the South Tower made this interesting testimony. "It must have at least been 4 to 6 weeks before 9/11, it was like rebuilding work going on upstairs. It was almost like pneumatic drills and lots of hammering, so much so that the floors were shaking. That is how noticeable it was. On one occassion, I opened the door to see what was going on, being nosey. When I opened the door, the whole office space was empty. There was nothing there at all. It was quite bizarre, because it was just empty." Furthermore Scott Forbes claims that there were long power outages, being supposedly electrical works, right from September 8th to 9th. During these power outages, anyone could get in and out with the building security shut down. Anyone could have also brought in and out anything and planted them. The mystery does not end here, because not only the twin towers collapsed in this inexplicable manner.