Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
Released the day before Thanksgiving in November of 2003... look, I still have my original
ticket stub from that afternoon! -- this science-fiction adventure film sadly only earned back half
of its $80-million dollar budget. Director Richard Donner does an excellent job adapting
the story, based on the novel by acclaimed writer Michael Crichton, which features a
mysterious group of well-funded scientists who inadvertently discover a wormhole to 1357
medieval France. The first 30 minutes are extremely intriguing, and well paced; perfectly
establishing the characters and consequences in a believable way. The plot follows a group
of resourceful archeologists who volunteer for a rescue mission, traveling back in time
646 years to save a missing colleague. Early in each of their respective careers, this
116-minute movie stars Paul, Frances O'Connor, Gerard Butler, and Neal McDonough, while Ethan
Embry, Michael Sheen, Billy Connolly, Anna Friel, and David Thewlis make up the giant
supporting cast with effective performances. In parallel narratives, one set in during
the 100-year-war, and the other in a New Mexican science facility, both groups of protagonists
are in a literal race against time, else they're trapped forever in the past, especially after
Thewlis resigns to failure, coldly asking, "How many lives has been lost on the cutting
edge of Discovery?". Now, I'm a sucker for a good time travel story... and this script
commendably adheres to a fixed-timeline universe - something that pays off with an awesome
final scene - but to be honest, a lot of the medieval stuff isn't particularly fascinating.
As with most sci-fi, some suspension of disbelief is required, especially regarding the action-packed
plot, which supposedly all takes place within just six-hours, despite being filled with
plenty of chases, escapes, battles, and romantic entanglements. Due to unfortunate studio pressure
resulting in a re-edit, the film's original score by Jerry Goldsmith, in what would be
that renowned composers final work, was replaced by Brian Tyler, who does manage to provide
a very lively and appropriate sound to the film, if forgettable. A simple, and easy picture
to follow, the cinematography here is solid, and the limited amount of visual effects are
also handled well. Rarely impressive, and even a bit hackneyed at times, this PG-13
rated picture is still extremely fun, tightly constructed, and decently memorable. I've
watched it every five years since its release, and will likely continue to do so. "Timeline",
"Interesting premise with exciting action." Now let's read some of your comments from
the YouTube comments.
"Timeline"'s score on the Rate-o-matic: a SIX and an EIGHT. Some mixed opinions for
this picture. While some of you enjoyed the action adventure, others critcized the ho-hum
execution, rating it a GOOD. Upon re-watching it recently, this picture is definitely better
than I remember. Despite being undemanding and shallow, it's a an enjoyable two hours,
I think it's GREAT.