What in The World are They Spraying? - Reality zone 2/8

One of the things that really shocked me was in one of the breakouts they had the benefits of these programs and then the risks. Now, of the benefits, the one thing that was stated was the, just cooling the planet. Some of the risks were ozone depletion, droughts in Africa and Asia. Stewart Howe I gotta tell ya, I came away from this experience after listening to these scientists for four days of symposiums really concerned because it's clear now that they are justifying, rationalizing, and looking to legitimize some really really horrible impacts, further impacts on our environment, and they're basically formulating the sales strategy and the implementation and oversight strategy and the funding strategy. Mike Murphy After San Diego, I was shocked by the programs that had been proposed so I decided to write about it and that night when I finished I sent the article to an online publication with my email address attached. When I woke up the next morning, my inbox was flooded with responses from around the world. Why? Because I had just broken the story on aluminum in geoengineering models, which I had no clue at the time that very few people knew about. Now this metal aluminum is being found in massive quantities, way above normal levels all over in rain, in soil, and in snow. After that, the calls came pouring in from people who were desperate for someone to investigate. That was the fuel that started the film. Before we started filming we had the opportunity to sit down with one of our favorite authors and documentarians, G. Edward Griffin, to find out what he knew about the subject. Mike Murphy I'd like to talk for a minute about an issue that's getting more and more attention and that's the issue which scientifically is called “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering” also called the chemtrail issue. G. Edward Griffin I am very well aware of the chemtrail versus contrail controversy. As far as I am concerned, it's an open and shut case. I have been watching the development of jet travel from its very beginning. I used to live near the Los Angeles airport and remember when the first jets came in and landed, and man! They make a big noise! We'd never heard a noise like that before. And we used to go down and sit at the end of the runway and watch these jets come in and take off because it was a novel experience. I've been watching jets all my life and I know about jet contrails. I've watched them. They're vaporized moisture, ice crystals, and they get out there in the atmosphere and they effervesce and evaporate and then they disappear, and you can see them. The plane moves along and the little white trail follows along right behind it, usually about ten to twenty lengths behind the plane or thereabouts and then it's gone. And you can still see them that way, by the way, once in awhile, and it's “there goes a contrail”. These other things we're talking about are not at all the same phenomena, at all. These planes go by and they billow out this white smoke and it covers the sky from horizon to horizon and it doesn't dissipate at all. And they criss cross each other, and you see this thing cover the sky and turn it milky G. Edward Griffin and people start to have trouble breathing and then you hear the stories about the aluminum and barium deposits that they're picking up in the residue and you put it all together and I don't see how anybody who's got their eyes open and their mind open can come to any other conclusion but that somebody is spending a lot of money and effort to spray the planet. And my question is why? I've got my own theories but I hope that there will be some good investigative reporters go out there and get us the answer. I know that whenever it's finally discovered, and it will be, the people who are doing it will undoubtedly say “Oh, we did it for you folks, for the greater good of the greater number. It's for society.” It's probably to prevent global warming or maybe it's to inoculate the people against a dreaded biological attack. “We can't go around shooting everybody in the arm but we can spray them and save their lives. You see how good we are? We're doing it for the benefit of society.” I know they're going to, whatever it is, they're going to say it was for your good and mine. Photos from Webcasts sources unclear at AAAS Conference, featuring Ken Caldeira, Geoengineer Think of this, if we had the ability to steer hurricanes, and a hurricane was going to slam into New Orleans. And let's say you could steer it so that it would hit Mississippi instead where for a hundred, that means I would be willing to more or less kill say eighteen Mississippians to save eighteen hundred New Orleanians. And if you do that deliberately, you know, are you murdering those hundred people, and there's all kinds of equity issues there. “FORA tv” Webcast Now also, we might be wrong about our steering and if we didn't do the research right, maybe our steering would intensify Katrina, and kill even more people in New Orleans and so this question of how you develop the confidence so you know your intervention will reduce overall damage and then how do you deal with the understanding that that you have damaged more people who wouldn't have been damaged before while saving people overall? G. Edward Griffin – in discussion again with Mike Murphy The spraying appears to be mostly in NATO countries. I've seen it here in the United States, I've seen it in England, I've seen it in Scotland, I've seen it in Canada and I've had reports from people who live in France. There's a grouping. There's a political grouping here of some sort and it's international in scope. It's not just a national phenomena and anyone who wants to investigate that, I think, has to take that fact into consideration. They're going to find a political grouping and a political motive here. But in my humble opinion, it's not for your good or mine at all. But whatever it is, we'll soon find out. I'm sure if you follow the old advice, which is to follow the money, you'll come to the answer sooner or later. Mike Murphy Soon we realized that we all shared the same need to get this information out there, to share with the public, to let people know what's being done. Ed felt so passionately about this issue, he offered to help us. G. Edward Griffin Well, the main thing now, since it looks like the budget is going to be met, is to get it done well. We don't come off the tree knowing any answers at all. Mike Murphy Yeah, we're not scientists. We're just asking questions. Exactly. G. Edward Griffin And we're very skeptical about the answers. That's being totally accurate, totally honest. Why can't people see this? They're not hearing it. They don't know. The facts are not being presented to them. We're very lucky, do you know that? Look at this opportunity that's been dumped on us. Mike Murphy I know. G. Edward Griffin [laughs] Opportunity. Mike Murphy It's going to be a battle, I know that. G. Edward Griffin A challenge and a battle, I know that. And why are we here if it's not for them? KPFK Radio 90.7 FM Los Angeles DJ to Mike Murphy and audience I've seen the sky criss-crossed with chemtrails and I don't remember if it was in LA or on the road, but I looked up one day and I thought, look at that! That's not the flight path man! It was a grid, a grid, a regular grid over the city and I couldn't believe my eyes! Mike Murphy Milky white clouds. Caller And you know it all seems so obvious and the evidence of what we have on the ground with the aluminum, the barium, and the strontium, and with what we see in the patents and what the geoengineers say are going to happen and for the everyday Joe, this is a slam dunk. Mauro Oliveira Geoengineeringwatch.org This is a very delicate moment for the powers that be because they're taking a very covered-up operation like the tropospheric aerosol program or chemtrails, Project Icharius or however many names it's had over the years and they're making overt into a geoengineering scientific shield to deflect sunlight because global warming is out of hand. So, at this very moment, the belly of the beast is right above us with no armor. Whether people believe in chemtrails or not, the geoengineering should be scary enough and when people learn about geoengineering, the chemtrails will then become apparent because, they're the same. Radio broadcast with Mike Murphy as guest. [station and location unknown] DJ So you're talking about a global conspiracy here. Mike Murphy Geoengineers propose doing this on a global level. Mike Murphy Narrating We're off to Redding, California. This is the second step after the AAAS meeting and we'll see what we find. We're out here in Northern California at Dane Wigington's house he owns over 2000 acres overlooking Lake Shasta and he told me about some of the challenges that they're having up here. Let's go talk to Dane and see what's going on on his property. We'll see what he's going through and also what action he's taking based on the test results that he has. Dane Wigington You know I have a background in the energy fields. I worked in the first solar plants in the continental US in the early 80s. My home was on the cover of the world's largest renewable energy magazine so this is my background. My goal has been to alert the public. There's a mountain of toxic material falling on us, period. Four or five years ago, our skies were typically blue but now you see it's covered with lines and haze and virtually nothing you see on the horizon, nothing you see in the sky above us is a natural cloud. I mean it is virtually all the remnants of these aircraft lines that you see fanning out, spreading into clouds, artificial clouds, but the sky has a very dirty look to it. It is not the white clouds blue sky that we had only a few years ago, but it looks like we had some sort of massive industrial activity or forest fires burning over there and we see that, typically, every night. You see even down to ground level the clarity drops off significantly and we don't see that except for the days when we have these long lingering trails that spread and cover the whole sky and on certain days you can see these trails dropping vertically like a veil. We assume the particulates are descending and we have the tests to prove we are being inundated with levels of aluminum in particulates that are literally tens of thousands of times what would already be considered high. So we're not talking about exposure to a slight percentage higher of these toxic materials. We're talking about quantities for example off the side of Mt. Shasta. If you could pan back [motioning off to the distance]. That's a landmark in Northern California, considered to be a pristine water source. A snow sample off the side of Mt. Shasta tested 61,000 parts per billion. Enter Francis Mangels – USDA Biologist with document of test results dating 07/09/08 [Pointing to document of Mt Shasta snow tested] This is just ordinary snow water and people are drinking this stuff when they're hiking on the mountain. And remember, government action is required at 1000. This is 61 times over the government limit and our hikers are drinking this poisonous water on Mt. Shasta mountain itself. Barium 83, strontium 383. Mike Murphy So this summer, the people climbing are drinking poison. Francis Mangels Basically. I certainly wouldn't want to drink 61,000 micrograms per liter of aluminum. Dane Wigington And again, we've already seen in 5 years soil pHs in this area that have escalated ten to twelve times and we can prove that conclusively. It is not speculation. We can prove conclusively that these metals have been in the rain. We have duplicate samples.