Tip:
Highlight text to annotate it
X
ACTION AS A RECORD.
THIS WAS A
TARGETED ATTACK.
VANESSA: HE IS A ATTORNEY
REPRESENTING MR. FORD.
HIS FOUR HORSES WERE SEIZED.
THEY CITED A LACK
WATER.
THE HORSES
WER EXAMINED IN
JANUARY 2015 AND THE FINDING
FECAL TESTS SHOWED ALL HAD
TAPEWORMS, DRIED URINE, AND
FECES PRESENT THROUGHOUT THEIR
COATS AND THEY HAD VARIOUS FOR
OF THRUSH--A BACTERIAL HOOF
INFECTION.
DIAMOND,A 12-YEAR OLD PINTO, W
IN THE BEST HEALTH-- GIVEN A
CONDITION SCALE.
PRINCESS, A 5-YEAR OLD PINTO,
AND CANDY,A 20-YEAR OLD
STANDARDBRED WERE GIVEN SCOR
OF 5 OUT OF 9.
MR-WELLS, AN 18-YEAR-OLD ARABI
SCORED 4 OUT OF 9.
BERMAN SAYS THE HORSES WEREN'T
MISTREATED
>> ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN
VETERINARIAN WHO WAS THE EXPER
AT THEIR TRIAL, HE SAID THAT THE
HORSES WEREN'T ABUSED AND THEY
NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN IN
THE FIRST PLACE.
VANESSA: FORD WAS ACQUITTED ON
40-CHARGES OF ANIMAL CRUELTY.
>> MR. FORD WAS VERY HAPPY,
JUST WANTED TO TRY AND GET HIS
HORSES BACK, WHICH HE'S NOT
GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO.
VANESSA: FORD WON IN COURT, BUT
LOST AT AN ANIMAL CONTROL
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
THAT PROCESS IS SEPARATE FROM
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AN ATTORNEY CAN BE PRESENT, BUT
ISN'T REQUIRED.
>> HE WROTE A LETTER THE NEXT
DAY REQUESTING THAT HE CAN GET
HIS HORSES BACK, BUT WHA
ADMINISTRATOR OR CITY OFFICI
IS GOING TO GIVE HORSES BACK TO
SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN ACCUSED
ANIMAL CRUELTY?
VANESSA: BERMAN SAYS HIS CLIEN
IS LEFT WITH A CLEAN CRIMINAL
RECORD AND EMPTY STABLES.
>> NOW OUR ONLY RECOURSE IS TO
SUE THE CITY
VANESSA: H SAYS WARD WILL NEVER
GET HIS HORSES BACK, BUT HE'S
COMPENSATE HIM FOR HIS LOSSES.
A SPOKESWOMAN FOR ANIMAL CONTROL
SAYS FORD WAS THE ONLY DEFENDANT
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND AN