Canon 1dx Mark Ii - Real world review - Canon 1dx ii 4k dslr camera specs and test results

Canon 1DX Mark II "Real World Review" | CANON 1DX ii 4K DSLR CAMERA Specs and Test Results Kevin has fine-tuned proven handling and controls in response to user feedback and delivered a big gain and continuous shooting performance It also pushes the NIC and d5 Volta wafer image quality within that standard sensitivity setting We can expect to see quite a few one DXi is at the Olympic Games this summer for excellent control layout and handling 4k recording at 60fps brilliant autofocus system against Only a small increase in resolution over the 1 DX limited use of the touchscreen technology video mode needs a dedicated quick menu summary of Canon eos-1d x mark 2 features 20 point two megapixel 5470 2 X 36 48 px 35 millimetres full frame Canon CMOS sensor extremely fast 14 FPS continuous shooting for up to 170 raw frames 16 fps in live view 4k 60p and full HD 120 P video with movie servo AFV a dual pixel CMOS sensor pork a frame grabbed for 8 point 8 MP still JPEG images from 60fps captured improved 61 point high density reticular AF 2 with expanded coverage Up to 61 AF points supported at F. 8 max aperture EF working range down to have - three continuous red illumination of up to all EF points within the camera is intelligent viewfinder to improve de azúcar 3 + predictive AF algorithm dual digit 6 + image processors Is a 100 250? 1200 with expansion down to 50 and up to 400 and 9600 360,000 pixel RGB and I are metering sensor with enhanced precision and performance flicker mode adjust shutter release timing to avoid flickering light issues three point two eight point one one centimeters clear view LCD to approximate 1 comma 620 K LCD with limited touch capability customizable quick control screen large bright pentaprism viewfinder with approximate 100% coverage in 0.76 X magnification dual access electronic level with top tional dedicated viewfinder display built-in GPS magnesium alloy body with canons most dust and weather resistant, DSLR design Shutter durability rated up to 400,000 cycles distortion correction diffraction correction and digital lens optimizer available for infer an aberration correction Dual memory card slots supporting ones yet, you diem a mode 7 and 1c fast 2.0. Memory card super speed USB 3.0 for high-speed gathering an image movie transferred gigabit ethernet support new wireless file transmitter w sze a new LPD 19 batter pack with LPD foreign and lpg for compatibility Lab test resolution we chose three rival cameras for the canon eos-1d x MK Ii to see how it measured up in our lab tests its predecessor the EOS 1d X the nickim t4s and the 1d x MK III is closest competitor the nick and d5 We've carried out lab tests on the 1d x MK Ii across its full is arranged for resolution noise including signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range We test the jpg shot by the camera, but we also check the performance with RAW files Most enthusiasts and pros prefer to shoot raw and the results can often be quite different JPEG resolution analysis the 1d x mk2 falls behind the d54 resolution at the higher sensitivity values Confirming our real-world findings that the Nick and camera produces sharper images straight from the camera RAW converted to tiff resolution analysis the 1 DX and Kenai is raw files follow the same pattern as the jpe G's Indicating that it's a step up from the 1 DX for detail resolution, but doesn't quite match the d5 at some sensitive a time lab test dynamic range Dynamic range is a measure of the range of tones the sensor can capture cameras with low dynamic range will often show glow highlights or blocked in shadows This test is carried out in controlled conditions using DxO hardware and analysis tools We use the exon analyzer to measure noise and dynamic range in controlled laboratory conditions JPEG dynamic range analysis the D 5 has the upper hand for much of sensitivity range But this is as much about how the two companies want their cameras jpe G's to appear as it is about dynamic range The Canon files have a little more contrast, which means their dynamic range is likely to be lower But they may be more appealing without any post capture editing raaah converted to jeff dynamic range analysis the raw file results appear to confirm our comments about the JPEG scores as the 1dx mk2 achieves a better score for much of the sensitivity range This means that for the lower sensitivity values at least the canon camera captures a broader range of tones Lab tests signal-to-noise ratio, this is a test of the cameras noise levels The higher the signal-to-noise ratio the greater the difference in strength between the real image data and random background noise So the cleaner the image will look the higher the signal-to-noise ratio the better JPEG signal-to-noise ratio analysis the 1dx mk2 leads the way for the low-to-mid sensitivity settings But the D 5 shows its low-light pedigree from around ISO 25 comma 600 and pushes ahead Indicating that its images are a little cleaner Raw converted to tiff signal-to-noise ratio analysis this chart shows that the 1dx mk2 performs well in our lab Beating the NIC and d5 throughout the canons sensitivity range however real-world shooting shows its a very close run race Just like its predecessor the canon eos-1d x. MK. Ii looks and feels like a modern camera That's designed for use by professional photographers who need a camera they can rely on even in bad weather These users will also appreciate the fact that little of the control layout has changed from the 1 DX So they've been transitioned painlessly for the new camera the one DXi dies intended market of professional news and sports Photographers understand the balance that's required between pixel count and pixel size current technology deems that 20 point 2 million pixels on a full frame sensor Enables the pixels to be made large enough to keep noise levels within acceptable limits at high sensitivity settings while still producing an image large enough to make full bleed double-page spreads for print It's clear that Canon has put a lot of thought into the 1 DX mark - along with some very powerful technology Image quality is aided by refinements such as putting the a /d converter on the sensor to reduce the amount of circuitry the image signal must travel along before being converted to a digital signal comparing high-sensitivity images taken in identical conditions with the NIC and e5 and canon eos-1d x & Ketu reveals that the NIC and camera it has slightly better control over noise however, there's not much in it and I would avoid using either model at ISO 409 comma 600 or higher in the case of the d5 We liked Canon got the handling pretty much spot-on with the original one DX and all the physical controls are with an equally easier each on the mk2 the controls accessible when the vertical grip is in use particularly impress There's no need to remember to reach to a different area to change the autofocus point for example it's good see dual pixel CMOS a left technology for faster smoother live view and video autofocus and It's nice that touchscreens are being taken more seriously With both Canon and Nick and putting them on their top-end SLRs. Even if their use is rather limited The addition of 4k video capability was to be expected in the 1 DX mk2 But the ability to shoot at that resolution at frame rates up to 60fps is a bonus We disliked While the layout of the physical controls on the 1 DX nkg was very good some aspects of the menu system could be improved It's great that the Quick Menu is customizable But it would be even better if you could set up two versions One for still shooting and the other for video to enable quick access to the control options that are most relevant to the shooting mode I'd also like to see touch control extended to make the menus quicker to use final verdict With the EOS 1d x mk2 canon has created a powerful and versatile camera. That's a great choice for professional sport and news photographers It doesn't have the outrageous sensitivity range of the Nick and e5 But it's very capable in low-light delivering excellent images within a standard sensitivity range Its autofocus system is also phenomenal getting moving subjects sharp even in very gloomy conditions While it may not be a dedicated video camera it does a great job with video and it's video Autofocus system is capable of operating smoothly for professional-looking footage You can fail to be impressed by the quality of the screen although some may wish for a little more touch control than it offers