Netanyahu U.N. Speech - 'Clear Red Line' For Iran

prime minister benjamin mainville will be israel's in this case the united nations today uh... all of our media coverage you know of course israel's a very important country in the world and obviously to the united states as well uh... hired hardly seen any other countries uh... leader did that kind of coverage words cnn fox msnbc's center and they're all of course ng credibly respectful i am not he's a right winger i don't agree with right wingers i don't agree with them here the united states and i do not agree with them a on in israel i do not agree with them on a boat i do not agree with them weathered out okay and then ya who is anil cup but warm on so i'd particularly don't agree with that strain of right wing so he goes on a makes a speech that i found ridiculous in many different ways will share with we won't solve our conflict with unilateral declarations of statehood we have to sit together negotiate together and reach a mutual compromise in which the demilitarized palestinian state recognizes the one and only jewish state so to ironies that first of all he says what the palestinians coming united nations ask overstatement all acceptable and the reason is i sent the below is because they have to recognize that we're the jewish state but way to meet you just said you would mechanism as a palestinian state so why do they have respect you as a joystick now my solution is me should both respect each other as fades into east and the palestinian state but it's a real ticketless argument to make to say that you have to recognize me but either no circumstances will i recognize you nor should anyone else in the world and in the second part of it is just as soon by the rest of the world is fine but here again is many outlook with it incredibly militarized state of israel and understandably so and with nuclear weapons giving a speech about how iran cannot ever have nuclear weapons and the palestinians in this case had to be demilitarized so what might be an outside force on what the impact that go they go why with that i'm not sure that's fair but we'll all kind of got used to it so we think like well of course one side is not allowed to have any weapons another cycle of eleven is the world homeostatic weapons i think short i certainly don't want to run having a new bazaar intimate weapons in the mailings but nonetheless the hypocrisy in those statements are a little glaring is actually objective about or kikuji shockingly some people have begun to paddle the absurd notion that a nuclear-armed iran would actually stabilize the middle east that's like saying a nuclear-armed al-qaeda would harsher in an era of universal peace uh... again here we have ironies firstly set up a straw man some people are saying that it be great of ron got its really hussein so you know well he says would be like al qaeda having it know it when iran is a state and their seventy million people in a and make care about those seventy million people how kate is not a state and every hard hit so they think they can hit you and you have trouble finding them which turned out to be sure to this about ten years to give them a lot right so it's very different factors and considerations that go into it and then second of all he says all my dot can you imagine with we have more news analyst but you will have nukes in the middle east if we can take everybody's snoops away great that's what i vote for preppy but again here's a guy with nuclear weapons saying can you imagine if we had nuclear weapons in the middle east united about it kazi rehab with thick so completed for nearly a decade the international community has tried to stop the iranian nuclear program with diplomas well that i was in work iran uses diplomatic negotiations as a means to buy time to advance its nuclear program sanctions have not stopped iran's nuclear program either there's only one way peacefully prevent iran from getting atomic bombs and that's by placing a clear red line i_d_ ron's nuclear weapons program now we're getting orwellian there's only one way to peace would stop them by threatening all-out war against them and having a red line that if they cross it will actually give you walk i get it that the second part based on about their is sometimes you have to block you have to say hey listen look i'ma come get you uh... so be sure you don't do that but idle thing that you know i was bluffing he's for the same neo consulate is here in the u_s_ are in israel who said about saddam hussein almighty god i'll tell you all door i would not try to use the forums what is going to tell and there's a red line any better not grows all what we think it was a lot we're going to use it i don't believe then continues red lines don't lead to war red lines preventable failure to place red lines that's often invited aggression if the western powers are drawn clear red lines during the nineteen thirties i believe they would have stopped nazi aggression in world war two might have been avoided in nineteen ninety if saddam hussein they've been clearly told that is conquest of kuwait would cross a red line the first gulf war might have been avoided clear red lines have also worked with iran earlier this year iran threatened to close the straits of hormones the united states to look clear redline and iran backed off aren't so first a serious point notified point uh... of a so he actually talked about iraq there his light on their own your own life or we should run a red light in nineteen ninety but wait a minute you mentioned iraq without mentioning a much bigger example remember when we drew their red line in the second gulf war and we thought all saddam hussein cross and whether he did i read it in is irrelevant because it's the same deal concert netbios familiar with and in league with who's a very closely because it lets go off kept well you just talking about how that would prevent more but that's not what happened in a row it cause the war and totally unnecessarily adams a playboy as you can start about red lines did you notice that there is a red light blinking near-term all the time apparently that that means likely that you're out of time but you've crossed that redline any so sometimes apparently red lines are flashing lights don't necessarily work but here's where it's going to get really fun now he brings out a diagram what about that there's a back already fail this is a bomb this is a fuse in the case of iran's nuclear plans to build a bomb this bomb *** to be filled with enough enriched uranium where's iran iran's completed the first stage now there well into the second stage if these are the facts why should a red line be drawn a red line should be drawn right here uh... before iran completes a second stage of nuclear richmond necessary to make a bomb unique is that what a nuclear bomb looks like as bad neighbors said earlier today i would be resettled well president where bomb you better issue is intended start before you like that too man that was that nuclear bomb drawing dale about ever seen one god you give me a better arts apartment in that that didn't look like a land nuclear bomb debate uh... what was amazing is that he put up this next picture of often do your job and i couldn't believe it really heightening underdeveloped like that and then he put the picture of israel and even a wet debate brad's not reminders will be interesting still